Legal Analysis of the Application of the Prudential Principle in the Safe Deposit Box Agreement between the Bank and the Customer

Authors

  • Mariska Fitriliya Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Dudung Hidayat Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati
  • Jaenudin Umar Universitas Swadaya Gunung Jati

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58860/ijari.v4i2.99

Keywords:

Consumer Protection, Exemption Clause, Prudential Principle

Abstract

The banking industry plays a strategic role in Indonesia's economy, and banks are legally obligated to apply the prudential principle in all their business activities, including Safe Deposit Box (SDB) services. However, a legal gap exists between this obligation and the practice of using unilateral exemption clauses in standard SDB agreements, which potentially harms customers and creates legal uncertainty . The research problem focuses on the research of legal provisions governing SDB as well as the implementation of the principle of prudence in the relevant agreements. The purpose of this research is to analyze the regulations and the strengthening of the application of the principle of prudence in order to ensure legal certainty for customers. The method employed was normative juridical, based on the theory of Soerjono Soekanto and Sri Mamudji, primarily using secondary data supported by limited empirical data obtained through interviews. The research findings indicate that the use of standard SDB agreement clauses by banks clearly violates Article 18 Paragraph (1) letter a of the Consumer Protection Law, Rendering such clauses null and void by operation of law. In practice, weaknesses persist in the application of this principle, particulary concerning the use of clauses that exempt banks from liability to customers. Although banks implement layered security Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) base on the principle of prudence, they may still be held legally accountable if proven negligent in maintaining the SDB security system. 

References

Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2017). Telaah Yuridis Terhadap Implementasi Prinsip Kehati-Hatian Bank Dalam Aktivitas Perbankan Indonesia. De Lega Lata, 2(I), 75.

B?czyk, M. (2023). Development of safety deposit box rental contracts outside the banking sector in Polish business practice. Studia Iuridica Toruniensia, 32(2).

Bhegawati, D. A. S., & Utama, M. S. (2020). The role of banking in Indonesia in increasing economic growth and community welfare. South East Asia Journal of Contemporary Business, Economics and Law, 22(1), 83–91.

Devina janice, Rinitami Njatrijani, A. (2018). Aspek Perlindungan Hukum Perjanjian Sewa-Menyewa Safe Deposit Box Pada Bank Maybank Indonesia. Diponogoro Law Journal, 5(3), 3.

Flögel, F., Schepelmann, P., Zademach, H.-M., & Zörner, M. (2024). Injecting climate finance into SME lending in Germany: Opportunities for and limitations of regional savings and cooperative Banks. ZFW–Advances in Economic Geography, 68(2), 111–123.

Hassanah, H., Wahyudi, W., & Aziz, N. A. (2023). Standard Clause Problems in E-Commerce Based on Indonesian Civil Law. Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika, 7(2), 221–238.

Hidayat, D. (2022). Formalisasi Mediasi Sebagai Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, Vol. 7(No. 2548-1398), 15441.

Jaenudin Umar, Sutrisno, E., & Abdullah. (2023). The Dispute Settlement For Consumer Protection By The Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency In Legal Assurance Perspective. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 10(1), 67.

Jameaba, M.-S. (2024). Digitalization, emerging technologies, and financial stability: challenges and opportunities for the Indonesian banking sector and beyond. Emerging Technologies, and Financial Stability: Challenges and Opportunities for the Indonesian Banking Sector and Beyond (April 26, 2024).

Kasri, R. A., Indrastomo, B. S., Hendranastiti, N. D., & Prasetyo, M. B. (2022). Digital payment and banking stability in emerging economy with dual banking system. Heliyon, 8(11).

Ramos-Munoz, D. (2025). The Validity of Derivatives Contracts. Legal Doctrine as a Vehicle of Dialogues on ‘Speculation.’ European Business Organization Law Review, 26(3), 531–565.

Sheehan, D., Shah, S. S. S. M., Koirala, B., Zhang, M., Wang, S., & Delalex, I. (2024). The Role of Prudential Regulation in Advancing Long-term, Private-sector Investment in Sustainable Development.

Sibagariang, R., Yanto, O., & Runaeni, N. (2025). Status of Nullity by Law the Agreement Due to Standard Clauses in the Consumer Protection Law. Sinergi International Journal of Law, 3(4), 207–222.

Stoop, E. A. (2018). Are cooperative banks different? The impact of the cooperative structure on organizational social capital.

Syarifa, R., Rahmawati, L., Andini, P. F., & Simanjuntak, M. (2022). Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Klausula Eksonerasi Pada Sektor Jasa Keuangan Dan Retail. Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan Dan Biosains Tropika, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.29244/agro-maritim.v4.i1.14

Thakor, A. V. (2019). The purpose of banking: Transforming banking for stability and economic growth. Oxford University Press.

Usman, R., & Rahmawati, D. (2022). Characteristics of Service Safe Deposit Box in Banking Activities. Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal, 7(1), 45–58.

Yanto, R. (2025). Implementasi Penerapan Pengaturan Bank Dengan Prinsip Kehati Hatian ( Prudent Banking ) Di Indonesia. Global Intellectual Community Of Indonesia Journal, 2(1), 23.

Wali, K., van Paridon, K., & Darwish, B. K. (2023). Strengthening banking sector governance: challenges and solutions. Future Business Journal, 9(1), 95.

Wiak, J. (2025). Transfer of Rights and Obligations Arising from a Contract without Consumer’s Consent as a Prohibited Contractual Clause. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 34(5), 305–317.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-24

How to Cite

Fitriliya, M., Hidayat , D. ., & Umar , J. . (2026). Legal Analysis of the Application of the Prudential Principle in the Safe Deposit Box Agreement between the Bank and the Customer. Interdisciplinary Journal of Advanced Research and Innovation, 4(2), 56–64. https://doi.org/10.58860/ijari.v4i2.99